Cal.com, a scheduling platform built on open source principles, is closing its codebase citing AI training threats. Critics argue the move misunderstands what made open source valuable in the first place.
Cal.com's decision to restrict access to its source code marks a significant shift for a company that built its reputation on openness. The scheduling startup cited concerns about AI companies scraping and training models on publicly available code as justification for the closure.
The move generated substantial discussion in developer communities, with 143 comments on Hacker News where the story reached 253 points. Critics argue Cal.com conflates two separate problems: protecting proprietary business logic and preventing AI training.
The Core Issue
Open source licenses already provide mechanisms for controlling how code is used. Cal.com could have adopted stricter licensing terms—such as prohibiting commercial AI model training—without abandoning open source entirely. This approach would address legitimate concerns while preserving the collaborative benefits the model offers.
Instead, closing the code entirely eliminates the transparency and community contributions that defined Cal.com's early competitive advantage. Developers who invested time understanding and improving the codebase lose those opportunities.
Broader Context
The tension between open source and AI training reflects genuine concerns across the industry. However, the solution lies in licensing evolution, not abandoning open source principles. Projects like Elasticsearch, Redis, and others have implemented license changes to restrict commercial AI use without reverting to closed-source models.
Cal.com's decision suggests a misunderstanding of open source value. The model thrives on community trust, transparency, and distributed innovation. Closing code may offer short-term protection but risks alienating the developer base that contributed to the platform's growth.
What's Next
The scheduling market remains competitive. Whether Cal.com's code closure strengthens or weakens its position depends on execution. Competitors maintaining open source approaches may attract developers seeking transparency and community participation.
The broader lesson: open source isn't threatened by AI—it's threatened by projects that abandon core principles without exploring alternatives. Better solutions exist between full openness and complete closure.
A developer successfully indexed a full year of video footage locally on a 2021 MacBook using the Gemma 2-31B model with 50GB of swap space, demonstrating practical on-device AI capabilities without cloud infrastructure.
Google has refreshed Android Bench with additional large language models, though its own Gemini model continues to underperform compared to competitors in benchmarking tests.
Former GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke's startup Entire has launched a decentralized Git network designed to handle traffic from AI coding agents. The infrastructure spans servers across the US, EU, and Australia.
Claude Cowork has expanded beyond desktop to include mobile and web platforms. Users can now start tasks on their computer, monitor progress on their phone, and access completed work from any device—even when their laptop is offline.