Twenty-six former Meta employees are suing the company for allegedly using AI tools to disproportionately target workers on protected leave during mass layoffs. The lawsuit claims Meta's ranking system failed to exclude employees on parental or medical leave.
The group of former employees filed suit against Meta over claims the company deployed internal AI tools to determine which workers to dismiss, but systematically excluded employees on protected leave from consideration.
According to the lawsuit, Meta used a "constellation" of AI systems to analyze performance data when deciding which staff to cut. However, the tools did not account for employees taking parental leave, medical leave, or other protected absences, resulting in those workers being disproportionately selected for termination.
The case centers on Meta's 2022 and 2023 layoffs, when the company cut roughly 21,000 jobs—about 34% of its workforce. The plaintiffs argue that relying on performance metrics without adjusting for protected leave violated federal and state employment laws.
Legal experts note that employment law typically requires companies to account for protected absences when making workforce decisions. Employees on approved leave cannot legally be penalized for their absence, and using performance data collected during that period without adjustment could constitute discrimination.
Meta has not yet publicly responded to the lawsuit. The company previously attributed its layoffs to over-hiring and economic headwinds, stating decisions were made through performance-based evaluations.
The case raises broader questions about AI's role in hiring and firing decisions. As companies increasingly automate workforce management, legal challenges highlight risks when algorithms fail to account for legal protections and human circumstances.
This lawsuit joins other employment-related legal challenges Meta faces. The outcome could influence how technology companies design AI systems for human resources decisions going forward.
Uber's weekly AI agent requests have grown nearly tenfold since February, yet the company has held spending flat since April after exhausting its entire 2026 AI budget in Q1.
A recent paper shows artificial intelligence often diagnoses and treats patients better than human physicians. The findings are prompting difficult conversations within the medical community about the profession's evolving role.
The Relay Q, launching next year, represents the latest push to establish voice as the primary interface for human-computer interaction, challenging the keyboard's decades-long dominance.
An Anthropic researcher demonstrated automated systems that can identify and correct misaligned behaviors without compromising overall performance. The systems improved on all 10 tested benchmarks measuring specific problematic outputs.