A new website is tracking which major companies have adopted passkeys, revealing that 24% of the world's most popular websites still lack support for the passwordless authentication method.
Passkeys represent a significant security advancement over traditional passwords, using cryptographic technology to eliminate phishing vulnerabilities and credential theft risks.
The tracking site highlights a persistent gap in adoption among major platforms. Despite growing industry support from tech leaders including Google, Apple, and Microsoft, roughly one in four top websites have not yet implemented passkey functionality.
Passkeys work by replacing passwords with biometric verification or device-based authentication, making them considerably more difficult to compromise than conventional login methods. Security experts have consistently recommended the shift away from password-based systems.
The naming and shaming approach aims to accelerate adoption by creating public accountability. As more services integrate passkey support, the security infrastructure for online accounts strengthens across the board. Users currently face a fragmented landscape where passkey availability varies significantly between platforms, limiting the practical benefits of the technology for everyday authentication.
As encrypted communications become harder to intercept, law enforcement agencies are increasingly turning to hacking suspects' devices directly rather than breaking encryption. This shift marks a new phase in the ongoing tension between privacy and security.
A critical macOS vulnerability allowing remote attackers to gain complete system control without passwords is actively being exploited in the wild. The bug affects the built-in screen-sharing functionality across multiple Mac systems.
Multiple water treatment facilities across the United States have been compromised in recent weeks by attackers allegedly connected to the Iranian government. The breach marks a significant intrusion into critical infrastructure systems.
A PBS station is at risk of losing 50 terabytes of archived content after its cloud storage provider, Iron Mountain, became unresponsive and denied access to the data. The station has no backup copies of the material.