Singaporeans show strong willingness to use AI shopping agents, but demand strict safeguards to govern how the technology operates, according to new research.
A study reveals Singaporeans rank among the world's most receptive populations to delegating shopping tasks to artificial intelligence systems. However, this openness comes with a critical caveat: residents want comprehensive guardrails and oversight mechanisms.
The research indicates Singaporeans are willing to adopt AI shopping assistants but seek clear boundaries on how these systems access personal data, make purchasing decisions, and spend money. Key concerns include transparency in algorithmic decision-making and user control over transaction limits.
This paradox—high adoption interest paired with demand for strict regulation—reflects a pragmatic approach to emerging technology. Singaporeans appear to view AI shopping as beneficial while recognizing potential risks around privacy, financial exposure, and autonomous decision-making.
The findings suggest successful AI shopping adoption in Singapore will require platforms to implement robust consent mechanisms, spending caps, and clear audit trails. Regulators may use these preferences to shape future AI governance frameworks.
Rabbit has released OS3, a cloud-based agentic operating system that runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux devices without requiring the company's R1 hardware. Users can connect up to five devices to a single account and select their preferred AI models.
Anthropic has launched Claude Opus 5.5, the latest iteration of its flagship AI model. The release comes as competition intensifies in the large language model market.
OpenAI released two cheaper versions of GPT-6 on Tuesday, with pricing roughly half that of GPT-5.6. GPT-6 Luna offers the steepest discounts at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens.
Fei-Fei Li, founder of World Labs, is urging independent and public-sector entities to oversee artificial intelligence development. She argues that tech companies alone should not assess the safety of increasingly powerful AI systems.