:

TRUMP, BIDEN AI ADVISERS CALL FOR BIPARTISAN SECURITY PUSH

AI DESK2 MIN READ
MON, MAY 4, 2026

■ AI-SUMMARIZED FROM 5 SOURCES ▸ TIMELINE

Former artificial intelligence advisers from the Trump and Biden administrations are urging lawmakers to implement tighter export controls and mandatory safety audits to address AI security risks. Dean Ball and Ben Buchanan say the issue transcends partisan lines.

Dean Ball, who advised the Trump administration on AI policy, and Ben Buchanan, who held a similar role under President Biden, have jointly called for bipartisan legislative action on artificial intelligence security. The two advisers are pushing for specific measures including stricter export controls on advanced AI technology and mandatory safety audits for high-risk systems. Their collaboration signals that AI governance concerns have gained traction across the political spectrum. Export controls target preventing sophisticated AI models and computing hardware from reaching adversarial nations. Safety audits would require companies to assess potential harms before deploying large language models and other advanced systems. Ball and Buchanan's joint statement underscores the growing recognition that AI regulation requires cross-party consensus. Both officials have experience navigating AI policy during transitions between administrations, giving them perspective on the continuity needed for long-term security frameworks. The push comes as Congress continues debating how to regulate the rapidly advancing AI sector. Lawmakers have proposed various bills addressing transparency, liability, and national security implications of AI development. Export restrictions face potential backlash from tech companies concerned about market competitiveness, while safety audit requirements could create compliance burdens for developers. However, proponents argue these measures are necessary to prevent misuse of advanced AI systems. Ball and Buchanan's bipartisan approach reflects tensions within the tech policy community between innovation advocacy and security concerns. Their recommendation suggests a middle path: targeted restrictions on the most sensitive technologies paired with mandatory oversight mechanisms rather than broad regulatory restrictions. The call for action arrives as the U.S. government works to establish coherent AI policy amid rapid technological development and international competition from China and the European Union, both pursuing their own regulatory frameworks.

■ SOURCES

TechmemeTechmemeTechmemeTechmemeTechmeme

■ SUMMARY WRITTEN BY AI FROM THE LINKS ABOVE

■ MORE FROM THE AI DESK

Singapore's Sea Ltd. has established a dedicated team to identify and pursue AI investments, signaling a strategic pivot beyond its e-commerce core business. The move reflects the company's search for new growth opportunities in artificial intelligence.

21H AGOAI Desk

Tech executives are laying off workers based on AI capabilities they may not fully grasp, according to Box founder Aaron Levie. The trend has accelerated dramatically, with 2026 layoffs already approaching 2025's total.

21H AGOAI Desk

AI startup Shift is offering free home cleaning services in New York and plans to expand to London, but the deal requires homeowners to let the company film cleaners performing household chores.

21H AGOIndustry Desk

Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey revealed that British banks remain unable to access Anthropic's Mythos AI tool. Bailey called for coordinated international efforts to address cybersecurity challenges.

21H AGOAI Desk

■ SUBSCRIBE TO THE DAILY BRIEF

ONE EMAIL, 5 STORIES, 06:00 UTC. UNSUBSCRIBE ANYTIME.