UC Berkeley Law will prohibit students from using AI tools in nearly all graded assignments starting summer 2026. The ban covers outlining, drafting, and proofreading, with only research applications permitted.
The restriction reflects a strategic decision by one of the world's top law schools: students must develop independent legal thinking before deploying AI as a professional tool.
The comprehensive ban eliminates AI from core academic work where lawyers traditionally develop foundational skills. Outlining and drafting exercises—fundamental to legal training—will remain AI-free zones. Proofreading assistance is also prohibited.
Research applications represent the sole exception, allowing limited AI use for information gathering and analysis.
The school's position challenges the broader tech industry's push toward immediate AI integration in education. Berkeley's approach prioritizes skill development over efficiency, arguing that lawyers need to master core competencies without algorithmic assistance before they can responsibly leverage AI in practice.
The policy takes effect in summer 2026, giving current students time to adapt while signaling Berkeley's stance on AI's role in legal education.
Startups like Altur are deploying AI chatbots to handle debt collection calls, automating a process traditionally done by humans. Y Combinator has backed six debt collection and settlement startups over the past six years.
Following recent earthquakes, Venezuelan developers and citizens deployed AI-powered websites and apps to locate missing persons and coordinate disaster relief as government response lagged.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has created a dedicated AI office and committed to protecting Australian creators from copyright infringement by artificial intelligence companies. The government rejected plans to grant tech firms free access to Australian data.