The US has formally accused China of conducting large-scale artificial intelligence theft. China has rejected the allegations as slander, as tensions escalate ahead of a potential Trump-Xi summit.
US officials claim China is systematically stealing AI technology and intellectual property on an unprecedented scale. The accusation marks an intensification of ongoing tech competition between the two nations, focusing on advanced AI capabilities seen as critical to future economic and military dominance.
China's government dismissed the charges as unfounded political rhetoric. Chinese officials argue the US is attempting to stifle China's technological development through false accusations.
The dispute threatens to derail diplomatic efforts. Trump administration officials are reportedly considering sweeping sanctions against Chinese entities if talks fail. Previous sanctions have targeted semiconductor exports and other critical technologies.
AI development has become a flashpoint in US-China relations, with both countries racing to lead in the field. US lawmakers have expressed concern about China gaining competitive advantages through intellectual property theft rather than independent research and development.
Formal negotiations between Trump and Xi could determine the next phase of US-China tech policy and potential trade restrictions.
SoftBank Group Corp. is pursuing a $10 billion loan to refinance debt tied to its investment in OpenAI. The funding move comes as the Japanese conglomerate manages its exposure to the AI sector.
X has launched NFL Gametime, an integrated platform combining live scores, statistics, and creator content for NFL fans. The partnership runs through the 2027 Super Bowl.
A federal judge ruled Thursday that the Trump administration's February designation of AI company Anthropic as a national security supply-chain risk was illegal and baseless. The decision blocks sanctions that could have cost the Claude maker billions in lost business.
OpenAI has experienced significant departures among its executive ranks, prompting scrutiny over the company's leadership stability and direction. The exits raise questions about whether current leadership structures align with the organization's trajectory.