New US funding rules would allow government officials to cancel research grants at any time and make peer review optional. Political staff would screen grants for forbidden topics.
The Office of Management and Budget has proposed changes to federal research funding that would grant unprecedented cancellation authority to government officials. Under the proposed rules, grants could be terminated without cause at any point during the funding period.
The changes would also make peer review optional for grant approval, replacing it with screening by political staff who would evaluate proposals for prohibited topics. This represents a significant shift from current practices where independent scientific experts assess research merit.
The proposal marks another attempt to reshape US science funding processes. Critics argue the changes could undermine research quality and scientific independence, while supporters claim they provide necessary oversight of federal spending.
The proposal has drawn attention across the tech and science communities, with discussions ongoing about implementation details and potential impacts on ongoing research programs.
The Supreme Court sided with the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday, rejecting wireless carriers' challenge to the agency's in-house penalty system for regulatory violations.
Shark Tank investor Kevin O'Leary agreed to reduce his planned Utah data center from 40,000 acres to roughly half that size. The decision follows mounting opposition from residents and activists.
Schneider Electric is issuing €800 million ($930 million) in debt, capitalizing on investor appetite driven by its expanding data center support business.